USGS Iowa Water Science Center

Skip Navigation
--HOME --DATA ONLINE --PUBLICATIONS --PROJECTS
Skip Navigation
Surface Water Ground Water Water Quality Sediment Precip Monitoring Flood Info GW Quality Monitoring Hydroacoustics
Skip Navigation
Emerging Contaminants Pharmaceuticals NAWQA Flood Profiles AG Chemicals --Cedar River RCRA


--

Cedar River Project Description



ASSESSMENT OF GROUND-WATER FLOW AND QUALITY: CEDAR RIVER ALLUVIUM, CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA

PERIOD OF PROJECT: 1992-2003
PROJECT CHIEF: D.J. Schnoebelen (djschnoe@usgs.gov)
STUDY AREA: Linn County
COOPERATING AGENCY: City of Cedar Rapids (Water Department)
Additional research has been provided by USGS Biological Resources Discipline and USGS National Mapping Discipline. The Iowa Department of Natural Resources has cooperated on a dye-tracing test of the Cedar River.

NEED FOR STUDY:

The City of Cedar Rapids, Iowa obtains its municipal water supply from shallow (less than 100 feet below land surface) wells completed in the Cedar River alluvium, an alluvial aquifer adjacent to the Cedar River. A total of 53 vertical and 2 horizontal-collector wells are installed in 4 well fields (East, Northwest, Seminole, and West). Since 1963, the alluvial aquifer has provided adequate quantities of generally high-quality water. Increasing population and industrial development have steadily increased the demand for water pumped from the alluvial aquifer. The City pumped about 8,847 million gallons (Mgal) in 1980, about 9,118 Mgal in 1990, and about 13,140 Mgal in 1997.

Managers of the City of Cedar Rapids Water Department are concerned about meeting the steady increase in demand for municipal water and protecting the water quality in the alluvial aquifer to ensure a safe water supply for their customers. The managers require information to determine the maximum safe yield of the alluvial aquifer, to plan for additional withdrawals to meet future demands, to identify possible options to reduce the infiltration of contaminants from the Cedar River into the alluvial aquifer, and to satisfy requirements for source-water protection programs under the Safe Drinking Water Act.

OBJECTIVES:

The objectives of the project are to:
  1. evaluate the ground-water flow system and to quantify the interaction between the alluvial aquifer, Cedar River, and underlying carbonate bedrock aquifer.
  2. evaluate pumping scenarios in the alluvial aquifer and to evaluate potential locations for additional water-supply wells.
  3. characterize water-quality in the alluvial aquifer, Cedar River, and underlying carbonate bedrock aquifer.
  4. identify and evaluate options to reduce infiltration and associated contaminant transport from the Cedar River to the alluvial aquifer.
  5. evaluate the effects of wetlands and ponds on recharge and water quality in the alluvial aquifer.
  6. compile and assess data required for source-water protection programs under the Safe Drinking Water Act.
  7. assess the fate and transport of nutrients in the Cedar River Basin using time of travel, synoptic and Lagrangian water sampling.

PROGRESS:

Hydrologic and geologic data from over 300 existing wells near the municipal well fields have been compiled. A network of observation wells (consisting of 59 small-diameter wells [0.14-inch outer-diameter], 15 4-inch outer-diameter wells, and 13 2-inch outer-diameter wells) has been installed. Geophysical investigations and lithologic logging have been used to determine the extent and thickness of the alluvial aquifer within the study area. Water levels in selected observation wells are periodically measured and continuously monitored with pressure transducers. A regional ground-water flow model covering about 231 square miles has been constructed to simulate ground-water flow and determine sources of water to the alluvial aquifer under steady-state conditions. Results of the regional ground-water flow model indicate about 74 percent of water pumped from the alluvial aquifer is induced infiltration from the Cedar River, about 21 percent is from adjacent and underlying hydrogeologic units, and about 5 percent is from precipitation. A detailed ground-water flow model (with greater resolution than the regional flow model) is being constructed to simulate ground-water flow under transient conditions, evaluate pumping scenarios, and determine capture zones for individual supply wells. Physical parameters (water temperature, pH, specific conductance, and dissolved oxygen) have been continuously monitored in the Cedar River and selected observation wells. Over 300 water-quality samples have been collected from observation wells, municipal supply wells, and the Cedar River. Nitrite plus nitrate (nitrate) and herbicides are the primary threats to water quality in the alluvial aquifer. Most nitrate and herbicides detected in the alluvial aquifer likely are transported with induced infiltration from the Cedar River. Nitrate concentrations in the Cedar River typically are greatest (<11.0 milligrams per liter) in the spring and fall, which corresponds to periods of fertilizer and manure applications to upstream cropland. Nitrate concentrations in the alluvial aquifer tend to be less than nitrate concentrations in the Cedar River, but also typically are greatest in the spring and fall. Triazine herbicides (such as atrazine and cyanazine) and acetanilide herbicides (such as acetochlor, alachlor, and metolachlor) are greatest in the late spring and early summer, following herbicide applications to upstream cropland. Atrazine is the most frequently detected herbicide and is detected at the greatest concentrations (<8.2 micrograms per liter in the Cedar River). Relatively large concentrations of dissolved iron (<20 milligrams per liter) and dissolved manganese (<7.5 milligrams per liter) have been detected in some wells. The relatively large dissolved-iron and -manganese concentrations are produced in localized areas by microbial-catalyzed oxidation-reduction reactions. A study of ground-water geochemistry in the Seminole Well Field indicated that carbonate-equilibrium reactions, weathering of aluminosilicate minerals, cation exchange, and oxidation-reduction reactions affect water-quality in the alluvial aquifer.
The water-quality of the Cedar River has a large effect on the water chemistry of the Cedar Rapids alluvial aquifer. In particular, research since 2000 has focused on a better understanding of flow and transport of nutrients in the Cedar River Basin. A series of synoptic studies have been carried out to assess bacteria and nutrient concentrations in the Cedar River Basin, both at low-flow and high flow. In addition, dye tracing studies using a nontoxic dye have been completed from Waterloo to Cedar Rapids to better understand the actual time of travel of compounds in the Cedar River. A Lagrangian sampling (where the same mass of water is sampled moving downstream) was recently completed in the fall of 2003. Results from the Lagrangian sampling will help with a better understanding of how nutrients are processed. Preliminary work on surface water modeling of the Cedar River has begun.

SELECTED REFERENCES:

  • Boyd, R.A., 1998, Characterizing ground-water flow in the municipal well fields of Cedar Rapids, Iowa with selected environmental tracers: Journal of the American Water Resources Association, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 507-518.
  • Boyd, R.A., 1999, Herbicides and herbicide degradates in shallow ground water and the Cedar River near a municipal well field, Cedar Rapids, Iowa: in Proceedings of the 1999 U.S. Geological Survey Toxic Substances Hydrology Program Meeting.
  • Boyd, R.A., 1999, Ground-water geochemistry in the Seminole Well Field, Cedar Rapids, Iowa: Journal of the American Water Resources Association, vol. 35, no.5, p.1257-1268.
  • Hansen, R.E., 1970, Geology and ground-water resources of Linn County, Iowa: Iowa Geological Survey Water-Supply Bulletin No. 10, 66 p.
  • Schnoebelen, D.J. and Schulmeyer, P.M., 1996, Selected hydrogeologic data from the Cedar Rapids area, Benton and Linn Counties, Iowa, October 1992 through March 1996: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-471, 172 p.
  • Schulmeyer, P.M., 1995, Effect of the Cedar River on the quality of the ground-water supply for Cedar Rapids, Iowa: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 94-4211, 68 p.
  • Schulmeyer, P.M. and Schnoebelen, D.J., 1998, Hydrogeology and water quality in the Cedar Rapids area, Iowa, 1992-96: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 97-4261, 77 p.
  • Squillace, P.J., 1996, Observed and simulated movement of bank-storage water: Ground Water, Association of Ground Water Scientists and Engineers, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 121-134.
  • Squillace, P.J., Caldwell J.P., Schulmeyer, P.M., and Harvey, C.A., 1996, Movement of agricultural chemicals between surface water and ground water, Lower Cedar River basin, Iowa: prepared as part of the Toxic Substances Hydrology Program: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2448, 59 p.

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America home page. FirstGov buttonU.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: http://ia.water.usgs.gov/projects/ia074.html
Page Contact Information: Click Here to email the Webmaster
Page Last Modified: Tuesday, 12-Jun-2007 15:04:59 EDT